diff --git a/mkdocs/docs/migration.md b/mkdocs/docs/migration.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d9c525b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mkdocs/docs/migration.md
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+# Migration
+
+## Unraid
+
+mergerfs and a parity-protected Unraid array can both present
+directories from multiple filesystems as a single view, but they treat
+storage membership very differently. With mergerfs, membership is a
+property of its **configuration**: branches are paths and can be added
+or removed at runtime without modifying the underlying filesystems.
+With Unraid's main array, membership is part of the **array state**:
+adding a data disk to an array with active parity normally requires
+clearing and formatting it, and removing one normally requires parity
+to be rebuilt.
+
+Those array-level requirements, not the User Share filesystem itself,
+are what shape migrations in either direction. When moving to mergerfs,
+existing data filesystems can usually be reused as-is. When moving to
+Unraid, populated filesystems can normally only be brought into the
+array before parity is activated. See [Project
+Comparisons](project_comparisons.md#unraid) for the comparison itself.
+
+| Operation | mergerfs | Unraid array with parity |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Add an empty filesystem | Add its mount path as a branch | Clear if necessary, then format and add |
+| Add a populated filesystem | Add its mount path; data is immediately visible | Not normally possible once parity is active without destroying its contents |
+| Mix filesystem types | Any filesystem the host can mount | Supported array filesystem types only |
+| Mix device sizes | Arbitrary | Data disks cannot exceed the parity disk size |
+| Change membership while mounted | Supported through the [runtime interface](runtime_interface.md) | Array configuration normally requires stopping and restarting the array |
+| Remove a filesystem and retain it unchanged | Remove the branch | Possible, but normal array removal requires parity to be rebuilt |
+| Remove a filesystem without recalculating parity | Not applicable | Requires zeroing the disk, destroying its filesystem |
+
+### Migrating from Unraid to mergerfs
+
+Unraid array data disks each hold a complete, individually formatted
+filesystem. `shfs` only unions their top-level directories, so there
+is no striped or parity-dependent layout to unwind. After cleanly
+stopping the array, unencrypted data filesystems can be mounted under
+Linux and their mount points used directly as mergerfs branches. The
+files do not need to be rewritten merely because the pooling
+implementation changed.
+
+For [encrypted Unraid disks](https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/system-administration/secure-your-server/securing-your-data/),
+securely retain the existing passphrase or key file before retiring
+Unraid. Open each disk's existing LUKS container with `cryptsetup`
+using those credentials, then mount the inner filesystem through its
+`/dev/mapper/` device and use that mount point as a branch. Do not
+reformat the disk or create a new LUKS container. Without a working
+passphrase or key file, the encrypted data cannot be accessed.
+
+```
+Unraid:
+
+    disk1 ─┐
+    disk2 ─┼─> shfs ─> /mnt/user
+    disk3 ─┘
+       +
+    parity
+
+mergerfs:
+
+    disk1 ─┐
+    disk2 ─┼─> mergerfs ─> /mnt/storage
+    disk3 ─┘
+```
+
+Unraid's convention of representing shares as identically named
+top-level directories also maps naturally to mergerfs' union
+semantics.
+
+* The parity disk is not a data filesystem and cannot become a branch
+  as-is. It can be reformatted as another data disk if parity
+  protection is no longer desired, or a separate parity solution such
+  as [SnapRAID](https://www.snapraid.it) or
+  [NonRAID](https://github.com/qvr/nonraid) can be used alongside
+  mergerfs if redundancy is still wanted.
+* If migrating incrementally while keeping the remaining Unraid array
+  operational, the normal Unraid disk-removal and parity-rebuild
+  requirements still apply to each disk removed.
+* If the entire array is being retired at once, those intermediate
+  Unraid parity rebuilds are unnecessary. Stop the array cleanly and
+  use the existing data filesystems as branches.
+* Named pools need care. A pool backed by a single filesystem can be
+  mounted and used as one branch. A multi-device Btrfs or ZFS pool is
+  not equivalent to a collection of independent Unraid array disks: it
+  can either remain intact and be mounted as one mergerfs branch, or
+  its data must be migrated elsewhere before its component devices can
+  be repurposed as independent filesystems.
+
+### Migrating from mergerfs to Unraid
+
+mergerfs places no special metadata on its branches, so their
+underlying filesystems remain unchanged. Direct reuse as Unraid array
+data disks requires local disks with a supported filesystem **and a
+partition layout accepted by the installed Unraid version**. A
+supported filesystem type alone is not sufficient.
+
+In particular, mergerfs can use a filesystem formatted directly on a
+whole device, such as `/dev/sda`, without a partition table. Unraid
+array data disks require a filesystem within a compatible partition.
+Such unpartitioned filesystems cannot be imported directly: back up
+their data, let Unraid partition and format the disks, then restore
+the files. Creating a partition table over the existing filesystem is
+not a safe conversion. Check Unraid's
+[partitioning guidance](https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/troubleshooting/faq/)
+before planning a no-copy migration.
+
+Current versions of Unraid support importing populated disks when
+constructing a new array, or after resetting the array configuration,
+provided that the populated data disks are added **before parity is
+activated**. Such a migration can therefore often be performed without
+copying the data:
+
+1. Stop mergerfs and cleanly unmount the branch filesystems.
+2. Create or reset the Unraid array configuration.
+3. Assign all populated mergerfs disks as data disks while no parity
+   disk is active.
+4. Verify that the existing filesystems and data are recognized
+   correctly. If a populated disk is reported as unmountable, stop and
+   investigate; do not format it, as formatting destroys its contents.
+5. Assign a parity disk at least as large as the largest data disk.
+6. Build parity over the completed array.
+
+Once parity has been established, that convenient path is effectively
+closed. Adding another populated mergerfs disk to the parity-protected
+array would require Unraid to clear the disk, destroying the existing
+filesystem. A staged migration in which populated mergerfs disks are
+added one at a time therefore generally requires either copying their
+contents into the existing array first or resetting/reconstructing the
+Unraid configuration so that all populated data disks are present
+before parity is established.
+
+Additional array-level constraints to keep in mind:
+
+* Only filesystem types supported by Unraid can be assigned as array
+  data disks.
+* No array data disk may be larger than the parity disk.
+* Array configuration changes normally require stopping and restarting
+  the array. Removing a data disk normally requires a parity rebuild,
+  and Unraid's parity-preserving removal procedure works by erasing
+  the filesystem and zeroing the disk, so it is unsuitable when the
+  goal is to retain that filesystem for use elsewhere.
+
+When migrating into individual **Unraid array data slots**, the
+following configurations require copying data to suitable array
+filesystems rather than reusing the source storage directly:
+
+* Remote filesystems or filesystem types Unraid does not support.
+* Storage that cannot be presented as a single array device, such as
+  multi-device Btrfs or ZFS pools or `mdadm` arrays.
+
+This restriction does not rule out retaining storage as a named pool.
+A compatible multi-device ZFS pool can be
+[imported into Unraid](https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/advanced-configurations/optimize-storage/zfs-storage/#importing-zfs-pools-created-on-other-systems)
+intact, without copying its data. Stop mergerfs and cleanly export the
+pool on the source system. With the Unraid array stopped, use **Add
+Pool**, assign all of the pool's devices (including support vdevs),
+set **File System** to **Auto**, and start the array to import it.
+If it is not recognized, investigate rather than format its devices.
+The imported pool remains separate from the parity-protected array;
+its redundancy comes from its ZFS layout, not Unraid array parity.
+
+A branch pointing at a subdirectory does **not** by itself require a
+data copy: eligibility depends on its underlying disk and filesystem.
+For example, importing compatible disks that contributed
+`/mnt/disk1/media` and `/mnt/disk2/media` preserves their contents, and
+Unraid combines the top-level `media` directories into a
+[User Share](https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/using-unraid-to/manage-storage/shares/#user-shares).
+Review the desired share layout; deeper branch directories may need
+to be reorganized within their existing filesystems rather than
+copied to new storage.
+
+### Summary
+
+mergerfs treats storage membership as a property of its
+**configuration**, while a parity-protected Unraid array treats it as
+part of the **array state**. Moving an existing filesystem into or out
+of mergerfs normally does not alter that filesystem at all. Moving
+populated filesystems into or out of an active Unraid parity array can
+require clearing disks, rebuilding parity, moving data, or
+reconstructing the array configuration.
+
+For semi-static data, mergerfs + SnapRAID provides pooling and parity
+while retaining the ability to add and remove independently formatted
+filesystems without modifying them. NonRAID provides an alternative
+real-time parity layer which can likewise be combined with mergerfs.
diff --git a/mkdocs/docs/project_comparisons.md b/mkdocs/docs/project_comparisons.md
index 4be8d4aa..c85b831f 100644
--- a/mkdocs/docs/project_comparisons.md
+++ b/mkdocs/docs/project_comparisons.md
@@ -293,10 +293,16 @@ provides a similar, but not real-time, solution.
 fork of Unraid's parity calculation solution and can also be used with
 mergerfs.
 
+Moving between the two is not symmetric because mergerfs membership is
+a configuration change while Unraid array membership is part of the
+array state. See [Migration](migration.md) for details.
+
 * **Better than mergerfs for:** turnkey pooling plus integrated real-time
   parity in one product.
-* **Worse than mergerfs for:** users who prefer a Linux distro-agnostic,
-  fully open-source component approach.
+* **Worse than mergerfs for:** non-destructive incremental addition and
+  removal of populated filesystems, arbitrary branch types and filesystem
+  layouts, and users who prefer a Linux distro-agnostic, fully open-source
+  component approach.
 
 
 ## NonRAID
diff --git a/mkdocs/mkdocs.yml b/mkdocs/mkdocs.yml
index 82242318..cd9cc6d9 100644
--- a/mkdocs/mkdocs.yml
+++ b/mkdocs/mkdocs.yml
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nav:
 - Tips and Notes: tips_notes.md
 - Known Issues and Bugs: known_issues_bugs.md
 - Project Comparisons: project_comparisons.md
+- Migration: migration.md
 - Benchmarking: benchmarking.md
 - Performance: performance.md
 - Tooling: tooling.md