From 106d54d7d618675e84fcd096e77b9f806f64b54a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:43:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Auto update

---
 beta/compare.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/beta/compare.html b/beta/compare.html
index 78fa6c4a..27aab8ed 100644
--- a/beta/compare.html
+++ b/beta/compare.html
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ A primary factor in categorizing storage solutions is their support for <strong
                                     <svg viewBox="0 0 24 24" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor"><path d="M12 2C6.48 2 2 6.48 2 12s4.48 10 10 10 10-4.48 10-10S17.52 2 12 2zm1 15h-2v-6h2v6zm0-8h-2V7h2v2z"/></svg>
                                 </button>
                                 <div class="info-content" hidden>
-                                    Btrfs has supported RAID5 since 2013, but serious issues in RAID5/6 support were <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Btrfs-RAID-56-Is-Bad">identified</a>. As of 2026, these remain unresolved. The official <a href="https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-man5.html#raid56-status-and-recommended-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wiki</a> states it should not be used in production.
+                                    Btrfs has supported RAID5 since 2013, but serious issues in RAID5/6 support were <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Btrfs-RAID-56-Is-Bad">identified</a>. As of 2026, these remain unresolved. The official <a href="https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-man5.html#raid56-status-and-recommended-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wiki</a> states that RAID5/6 support should not be used in production.
                                 </div>
                             </div>
                         </td>