diff --git a/faq.html b/faq.html
index 799bde86..e5594211 100644
--- a/faq.html
+++ b/faq.html
@@ -443,17 +443,19 @@ For the data disks, follow these suggestions:
 <td>OK. In general you can use whatever filesytem you like. Just see the following notes for some exceptions.</td>
 </tr>
 <td>Btrfs</td>
-<td>OK. But ensure to build SnapRAID with the libblkid library to get UUID support. You will be warned if this doesn't happen.</td>
+<td>OK. But ensure to build SnapRAID with the libblkid library to get UUID support.
+You will be warned at every run if this doesn't happen.</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>ReiserFS</td>
-<td>Unsure. Where are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/194dee16">reports</a> of speed increase when switching from ReiserFS to other filesystem.
+<td>Unsure. Where are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/194dee16">reports</a>
+of speed increase when switching from ReiserFS to other filesystem.
 ext4 and XFS are anyway better. Use them insted.</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>FAT</td>
-<td>Unsure. There are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/455e8d63">reports</a> of duplicate inodes cases.
-NTFS is anyway a lot faster. Use it insted.</td>
+<td>Unsure. There are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/455e8d63">reports</a>
+of duplicate inodes cases. NTFS is anyway a lot faster. Use it insted.</td>
 </tr>
 </table>