rt/snapraid
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/amadvance/snapraid.git synced 2026-10-26 19:01:57 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Auto update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andrea Mazzoleni 2025-10-13 13:50:12 +02:00
parent b79f6ef385
commit c28319c63e
1 changed files with 0 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
faq.html
View file

@ -469,12 +469,6 @@ Note that multiple ZFS snapshots are not supported.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ReiserFS</td>
<td>Unsure. Where are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/194dee16">reports</a>
of speed increase when switching from ReiserFS to other file-system.
ext4 and XFS are anyway better. Use them instead.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FAT</td>
<td>Unsure. There are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/455e8d63">reports</a>
of duplicate inodes cases. NTFS is anyway a lot faster. Use it instead.</td>
@ -519,12 +513,6 @@ You will be warned at every run if this doesn't happen.</td>
It also doesn't seem to implement at the best the <a href="http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/posix_fadvise.html">posix_fadvise()</a> command.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ReiserFS</td>
<td>Unsure. Where are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/194dee16">reports</a>
of speed increase when switching from ReiserFS to other file-system.
ext4 and XFS are anyway better. Use them instead.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NTFS</td>
<td>OK in Windows. No in Linux, as it doesn't support <a href="http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/fallocate.2.html">fallocate()</a> command needed to allocated the parity files.
You can anyway use it if you limit the use of the parity disk to contain only the parity file.