Function renaming to get better consistency

This commit is contained in:
Andrea Mazzoleni 2016-01-16 14:26:05 +01:00
parent 9ade11483e
commit d2991f736c
10 changed files with 50 additions and 50 deletions

View file

@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int state_hash_process(struct snapraid_state* state, block_off_t blocksta
struct snapraid_block* block;
unsigned block_state;
block = fs_par2block_maybe(disk, i);
block = fs_par2block_find(disk, i);
/* get the state of the block */
block_state = block_state_get(block);
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int state_hash_process(struct snapraid_state* state, block_off_t blocksta
struct snapraid_file* file;
block_off_t file_pos;
block = fs_par2block_maybe(disk, i);
block = fs_par2block_find(disk, i);
/* get the state of the block */
block_state = block_state_get(block);
@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int block_is_enabled(void* void_plan, block_off_t i)
if (!disk)
continue;
block = fs_par2block_maybe(disk, i);
block = fs_par2block_find(disk, i);
if (block_has_file(block))
one_valid = 1;
@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void sync_data_reader(struct snapraid_worker* worker, struct snapraid_tas
}
/* get the block */
task->block = fs_par2block_maybe(disk, blockcur);
task->block = fs_par2block_find(disk, blockcur);
/* if the block has no file, meanining that it's EMPTY or DELETED, */
/* it doesn't partecipate in the new parity computation */
@ -1137,9 +1137,9 @@ static int state_sync_process(struct snapraid_state* state, struct snapraid_pari
if (!handle[j].disk)
continue;
block = fs_par2block_maybe(handle[j].disk, blockcur);
block = fs_par2block_find(handle[j].disk, blockcur);
if (block == BLOCK_EMPTY) {
if (block == BLOCK_NULL) {
/* nothing to do */
continue;
}