From ef90978fd953f53982cb6c5c3ae7c71bcf8d211b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:58:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Auto update

---
 faq.html | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/faq.html b/faq.html
index ac2ce4a7..799bde86 100644
--- a/faq.html
+++ b/faq.html
@@ -447,11 +447,13 @@ For the data disks, follow these suggestions:
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>ReiserFS</td>
-<td>Unsure. Where are user <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/194dee16">reports</a> reporting speed increase when switching from ReiserFS to other filesystem.
+<td>Unsure. Where are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/194dee16">reports</a> of speed increase when switching from ReiserFS to other filesystem.
+ext4 and XFS are anyway better. Use them insted.</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>FAT</td>
-<td>Unsure. There are resports of duplicate inodes cases. NTFS is anyway a lot faster. Use it insted.</td>
+<td>Unsure. There are <a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/455e8d63">reports</a> of duplicate inodes cases.
+NTFS is anyway a lot faster. Use it insted.</td>
 </tr>
 </table>