rt/snapraid
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/amadvance/snapraid.git synced 2026-10-26 19:01:57 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Auto update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andrea Mazzoleni 2026-03-17 00:43:37 +01:00
parent f82309a0c0
commit 106d54d7d6
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
beta/compare.html
View file

@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ A primary factor in categorizing storage solutions is their support for <strong
<svg viewBox="0 0 24 24" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor"><path d="M12 2C6.48 2 2 6.48 2 12s4.48 10 10 10 10-4.48 10-10S17.52 2 12 2zm1 15h-2v-6h2v6zm0-8h-2V7h2v2z"/></svg>
</button>
<div class="info-content" hidden>
Btrfs has supported RAID5 since 2013, but serious issues in RAID5/6 support were <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Btrfs-RAID-56-Is-Bad">identified</a>. As of 2026, these remain unresolved. The official <a href="https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-man5.html#raid56-status-and-recommended-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wiki</a> states it should not be used in production.
Btrfs has supported RAID5 since 2013, but serious issues in RAID5/6 support were <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Btrfs-RAID-56-Is-Bad">identified</a>. As of 2026, these remain unresolved. The official <a href="https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-man5.html#raid56-status-and-recommended-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wiki</a> states that RAID5/6 support should not be used in production.
</div>
</div>
</td>